Moderators: Game Master, Justice, Keeping The Peace, Pollster
Hoppy wrote:We are trying to run out of the pistol the backs are being meet in the backfield The defense is teeing off on the runner only because he will be the only one who dare to carry the ball. I posted this earlier and it's the one article that tell the true story and not step around the eggshell Named Manning
http://t.co/EVQlsLM46V
under offense the writer gives you his and my belief of what's wrong with this offense. Yes the line has problems I have said this but the QB has to help the line I 've also said that. As I will not ever change my feelings on this and you guys will one day I'm sure I will keep rooting for him but I will be the one you hear screaming Bench the bum when the Broncos start playing good teams B/C we haven't played a good one yet.
Hoppy wrote:Not really a big deal that Pats lost their LT for the year The beat goes on
http://t.co/DoNQQIwI1f
Hoppy wrote:OnlyInUtah wrote:http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/nfl-whats-wrong-with-the-denver-broncos-offense.html/?ref=YF
You're beating that dead horse to smithereens Hop.
The o-line get the blame? they were brought here to run the zone blocking scheme. Not pass block for a offense that could never run the ball sense the Broncos installed it. Mannings Pistol will never work without a QB who can take off with the ball. A QB that can run will keep the defense honest. The pistol is good for the passing game for Peyton also again because he can't run forward how will he run backwards. so he doesn't give the back a head start and they are usually hit in the backfield. They blamed M.Ball for getting hit behind the line now CJ is getting hit behind the line so is Hillman. Blame the line find other ways that we can blame everyone but the great Peyton Manning. One day I will stand up and give you and Big mac a Bronco salute when you come over to the light and away from the orange colored glasses.I'm a fan and I want a SB especially sense the Cubs beat my Cardinals
Hoppy wrote:Hey Mac look at the film on this and they show both INT's that manning threw last Sunday. Notice the receiver broke to the left where there was no coverage on the first one. Goal line plats most are read plays and if the QB reads one thing and the receiver reads another bad things happen. Peyton even says we have to get on the same page. Looking at this clearly the receiver read the play right and Manning threw into the coverage. The second INT was a good pass just late. He would have made that same pass 2 years ago with not as much air and on time. He never looked the safety off. These are things Manning would do in his sleep 2 years ago. Now he's just living on his rep. And not doing a good job of that.
Andrew Mason http://t.co/ei8U4XHOAE
Kub said that the 3 TE set was very effective. If so why didn't they stay with it. Sounds like smells like smoke. So far Jackson is playing his but off in this contract year
OnlyInUtah wrote:Hop? Nobody is defending Manning. We are just pointing out Oz isn't starter quality and our line and TE's are awful. You want to throw the season away because of your hatred of Manning.....you put in Oz right now and we will look like the Browns immediately. He's another bust despite what he does against 2nd and third stringers in preseason. We'll go right into rebuilding mode.
OnlyInUtah wrote:Hoppy wrote:OnlyInUtah wrote:http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/nfl-whats-wrong-with-the-denver-broncos-offense.html/?ref=YF
You're beating that dead horse to smithereens Hop.
The o-line get the blame? they were brought here to run the zone blocking scheme. Not pass block for a offense that could never run the ball sense the Broncos installed it. Mannings Pistol will never work without a QB who can take off with the ball. A QB that can run will keep the defense honest. The pistol is good for the passing game for Peyton also again because he can't run forward how will he run backwards. so he doesn't give the back a head start and they are usually hit in the backfield. They blamed M.Ball for getting hit behind the line now CJ is getting hit behind the line so is Hillman. Blame the line find other ways that we can blame everyone but the great Peyton Manning. One day I will stand up and give you and Big mac a Bronco salute when you come over to the light and away from the orange colored glasses.I'm a fan and I want a SB especially sense the Cubs beat my Cardinals
Nobody picked up Ball because he sucks.
Bigmac1979 wrote:Hoppy wrote:Hey Mac look at the film on this and they show both INT's that manning threw last Sunday. Notice the receiver broke to the left where there was no coverage on the first one. Goal line plats most are read plays and if the QB reads one thing and the receiver reads another bad things happen. Peyton even says we have to get on the same page. Looking at this clearly the receiver read the play right and Manning threw into the coverage. The second INT was a good pass just late. He would have made that same pass 2 years ago with not as much air and on time. He never looked the safety off. These are things Manning would do in his sleep 2 years ago. Now he's just living on his rep. And not doing a good job of that.
Andrew Mason http://t.co/ei8U4XHOAE
Kub said that the 3 TE set was very effective. If so why didn't they stay with it. Sounds like smells like smoke. So far Jackson is playing his but off in this contract year
I'm not trying to defend Manning...he looks almost as cooked to me as he does to you...where we mostly differ is whether the rest of the team (mostly the line) can improve and evolve around Manning's deficiencies, as I 1) don't want to waste a #1 defense, 2) am skeptical that the defense will stay intact in the offseason, and 3) don't trust a first year QB (especially one that hasn't really provided many WOW moments anyway) to lead a #1 defense to the playoffs...Trust me, I'm not feeling that optimistic, but I'm not throwing in the towel.
Hoppy wrote:We are trying to run out of the pistol the backs are being meet in the backfield The defense is teeing off on the runner only because he will be the only one who dare to carry the ball. I posted this earlier and it's the one article that tell the true story and not step around the eggshell Named Manning
http://t.co/EVQlsLM46V
under offense the writer gives you his and my belief of what's wrong with this offense. Yes the line has problems I have said this but the QB has to help the line I 've also said that. As I will not ever change my feelings on this and you guys will one day I'm sure I will keep rooting for him but I will be the one you hear screaming Bench the bum when the Broncos start playing good teams B/C we haven't played a good one yet.
Hoppy wrote:Bigmac1979 wrote:Hoppy wrote:Hey Mac look at the film on this and they show both INT's that manning threw last Sunday. Notice the receiver broke to the left where there was no coverage on the first one. Goal line plats most are read plays and if the QB reads one thing and the receiver reads another bad things happen. Peyton even says we have to get on the same page. Looking at this clearly the receiver read the play right and Manning threw into the coverage. The second INT was a good pass just late. He would have made that same pass 2 years ago with not as much air and on time. He never looked the safety off. These are things Manning would do in his sleep 2 years ago. Now he's just living on his rep. And not doing a good job of that.
Andrew Mason http://t.co/ei8U4XHOAE
Kub said that the 3 TE set was very effective. If so why didn't they stay with it. Sounds like smells like smoke. So far Jackson is playing his but off in this contract year
I'm not trying to defend Manning...he looks almost as cooked to me as he does to you...where we mostly differ is whether the rest of the team (mostly the line) can improve and evolve around Manning's deficiencies, as I 1) don't want to waste a #1 defense, 2) am skeptical that the defense will stay intact in the offseason, and 3) don't trust a first year QB (especially one that hasn't really provided many WOW moments anyway) to lead a #1 defense to the playoffs...Trust me, I'm not feeling that optimistic, but I'm not throwing in the towel.
I understand your points but Brock will be a first year starter next season what's the difference. He can still pick Mannings mind if you do it this season
Hoppy wrote:Bigmac1979 wrote:Hoppy wrote:Hey Mac look at the film on this and they show both INT's that manning threw last Sunday. Notice the receiver broke to the left where there was no coverage on the first one. Goal line plats most are read plays and if the QB reads one thing and the receiver reads another bad things happen. Peyton even says we have to get on the same page. Looking at this clearly the receiver read the play right and Manning threw into the coverage. The second INT was a good pass just late. He would have made that same pass 2 years ago with not as much air and on time. He never looked the safety off. These are things Manning would do in his sleep 2 years ago. Now he's just living on his rep. And not doing a good job of that.
Andrew Mason http://t.co/ei8U4XHOAE
Kub said that the 3 TE set was very effective. If so why didn't they stay with it. Sounds like smells like smoke. So far Jackson is playing his but off in this contract year
I'm not trying to defend Manning...he looks almost as cooked to me as he does to you...where we mostly differ is whether the rest of the team (mostly the line) can improve and evolve around Manning's deficiencies, as I 1) don't want to waste a #1 defense, 2) am skeptical that the defense will stay intact in the offseason, and 3) don't trust a first year QB (especially one that hasn't really provided many WOW moments anyway) to lead a #1 defense to the playoffs...Trust me, I'm not feeling that optimistic, but I'm not throwing in the towel.
I understand your points but Brock will be a first year starter next season what's the difference. He can still pick Mannings mind if you do it this season
CSpringsNSD wrote:I don't think we have to give up the season to give Oz some real action to see what he can do. Sit manning for the browns and the bears. This team with this defense should be able to beat those teams with or without Manning. If Oz can't perform against those two teams then we know now that he isn't the future. If he performs well against them maybe we look at giving him more opportunities this year.
CSpringsNSD wrote:I don't think we have to give up the season to give Oz some real action to see what he can do. Sit manning for the browns and the bears. This team with this defense should be able to beat those teams with or without Manning. If Oz can't perform against those two teams then we know now that he isn't the future. If he performs well against them maybe we look at giving him more opportunities this year.
Bigmac1979 wrote:CSpringsNSD wrote:I don't think we have to give up the season to give Oz some real action to see what he can do. Sit manning for the browns and the bears. This team with this defense should be able to beat those teams with or without Manning. If Oz can't perform against those two teams then we know now that he isn't the future. If he performs well against them maybe we look at giving him more opportunities this year.
I guess that could work, but with our rookie OLs, Mathis signing so late, and Kubes having to keep shifting the scheme, I'm thinking consistency and stability is needed. Also, sometimes QB controversies can prove distracting...what if Oz looks decent against a middling Haden-less Browns, but then Peyton struggles against a stellar GB team? I'd hate to go into a indecisive QB shuffle like the Texans. I'd rather commit to one or the other for the rest of the season.
Hoppy wrote:Bigmac1979 wrote:CSpringsNSD wrote:I don't think we have to give up the season to give Oz some real action to see what he can do. Sit manning for the browns and the bears. This team with this defense should be able to beat those teams with or without Manning. If Oz can't perform against those two teams then we know now that he isn't the future. If he performs well against them maybe we look at giving him more opportunities this year.
I guess that could work, but with our rookie OLs, Mathis signing so late, and Kubes having to keep shifting the scheme, I'm thinking consistency and stability is needed. Also, sometimes QB controversies can prove distracting...what if Oz looks decent against a middling Haden-less Browns, but then Peyton struggles against a stellar GB team? I'd hate to go into a indecisive QB shuffle like the Texans. I'd rather commit to one or the other for the rest of the season.
There is already talk in that locker room They hear it out here and they talk about it among themselves. If Manning has a bad game again and makes the Browns Look A Like Playoff Team Like he did with the raiders who by the way beat themselves. The cries will spread in that Locker room. Brock had a great practice today tweets are saying.
OnlyInUtah wrote:The problem is....we can think anything we want but Kubiak is the coach and he has to decide what he thinks is best for the team......not us. I trust him to make the right call on this. It's his ass on the line ultimately and he knows the situation a hell of a lot better than any of us or some hack sportswriter just trying to get someone to read his article.
CSpringsNSD wrote:OnlyInUtah wrote:The problem is....we can think anything we want but Kubiak is the coach and he has to decide what he thinks is best for the team......not us. I trust him to make the right call on this. It's his ass on the line ultimately and he knows the situation a hell of a lot better than any of us or some hack sportswriter just trying to get someone to read his article.
I agree, I trust Kubes a lot more than I ever trusted Fox. I also know that Manning is being watched by Elway as well.
OnlyInUtah wrote:CSpringsNSD wrote:OnlyInUtah wrote:The problem is....we can think anything we want but Kubiak is the coach and he has to decide what he thinks is best for the team......not us. I trust him to make the right call on this. It's his ass on the line ultimately and he knows the situation a hell of a lot better than any of us or some hack sportswriter just trying to get someone to read his article.
I agree, I trust Kubes a lot more than I ever trusted Fox. I also know that Manning is being watched by Elway as well.
I think when it's time to pull the plug both Elway and Kubiak will pull the trigger. Elway never has seemed shy about that. It could be after the Browns game if things continue the way they are. I think they know once you play that card there is no going back.
Bigmac1979 wrote:Hoppy wrote:We are trying to run out of the pistol the backs are being meet in the backfield The defense is teeing off on the runner only because he will be the only one who dare to carry the ball. I posted this earlier and it's the one article that tell the true story and not step around the eggshell Named Manning
http://t.co/EVQlsLM46V
under offense the writer gives you his and my belief of what's wrong with this offense. Yes the line has problems I have said this but the QB has to help the line I 've also said that. As I will not ever change my feelings on this and you guys will one day I'm sure I will keep rooting for him but I will be the one you hear screaming Bench the bum when the Broncos start playing good teams B/C we haven't played a good one yet.
In that article, the author says this: "Our running game could be fine. Do you know why it isn't fine? It's running out of the pistol. That's what isn't fine!" He seems to putting the lion's share of blame on the scheme, as if running out of shotgun or pistol without a running QB is the reason our, or anyone's, running game fails. But in the first two games (can't find data since then), Denver gained 3.4 yards per carry from the shotgun formation, but only 2.6 yards from under center...that's almost a yard difference. That result extends to last year, when Denver gained 4.9 yards running out of the gun, but only 3.2 yards from under center (1.7 yards less per carry!!!). In the three games since Denver has gone full Pistol/Gun, they are rushing at 3.7 yards per carry...even if you remove Hillman's 72 yard scamper, the Pistol has the same YPC as Denver had from under center: 2.6.
Return to The Blog Rooms 2015 (jump on in)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests