IckyIPA wrote:I've been listening to a bunch of different opinions on how our QB situation should go. I relly couldn't come up with one on my own that I was comfortable with. Then I heard Marshall Faulk's take. He thinks, we should start Brock and if it is not working fall back on Peyton again. He reasoned, if we start Peyton and it's not working, that it probably won't work for Brock either. When we need a spark, the team is more likely to respond for Peyton. If it ain't broke don't fix it. If it is, which we've experienced a few times this year, fix it quick. That take led me to reason, that 2 weeks is plenty of time to formulate two decidedly different game plans and get the team and QBs ready in both. Regardless of who starts, we can keep Ds guessing and off balance. We may also be able to alternate at will. Imagine a team having to gameplan against two succinctly different offenses and the twists they would present. The longer we wait to announce a starter the more that already applies. Why not take full advantage of our situation? Any of you can feel free to submit this to the local papers or talk shows in hopes Kubiak gets wind of it quick...lol
The whole season Brock has been a first half wonder and Manning good in the second half. Just plan to make the switch when they head in for halftime

I do like this plan though. Keeps Manning rested and gives Brock the start. He already knew that if he stunk it up that he would get pulled. It's that way for any QB in the league, no different now. If he plays well they keep him in.